Guidelines for Progression
Every catalyst is on a personal journey of improvement for which the following guidelines can be used to assess progression. A catalyst can measure their own progression by actively measuring the following indicators.
-
The first point of contact for questions, new solutions, and significant changes to existing solutions
-
Follow up on questions, new solutions, and significant changes to existing solutions to ensure they are addressed
-
The non-conformities to the playbook are kept to a minimum
-
Ensure that topics that are current in the council are shared back to their respective organisation
-
The relevant aspects of the playbook are known by themselves and their colleagues
-
Actively inform the team of the need to review with the architecture council
-
Proactively look for opportunities for architects to have an impact, in particular in emerging areas
-
Actively participate in architecture reviews
-
Influence changes in architecture for their departments/domains in all areas, e.g., reviews, implementation, and council meetings
Each indicator is related to one or more goals and can be calculated through various tools, as described below
The first point of contact for questions, new solutions, and significant changes to existing solutions |
Definition |
The percentage of people who consider the catalyst to be the first point of contact |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Communication, Liaison |
|
Calculation rule |
Number of team members who agree that the catalyst is the first point of contact / Number of team members |
|
Tools |
Survey to team members |
Follow up on questions, new solutions, and significant changes to existing solutions to ensure they are addressed |
Definition |
Number of questions resolved per year |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Communication, Adoption |
|
Calculation rule |
Number of questions resolved |
|
Tools |
Email, GChat, Slack, Verbal |
The non-conformities to the playbook are kept to a minimum |
Definition |
Number of non-conformities to the playbook resolved per year |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Alignment |
|
Calculation rule |
Not directly measurable |
|
Tools |
GitLab |
Ensure that topics that are current in the council are shared back to their respective organisation |
Definition |
Number of communications shared in the year, which include topics from the council |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Communication |
|
Calculation rule |
Number of emails, chats, and meetings that include topics from the council |
|
Tools |
Email, GChat, Slack, Calendar |
The relevant aspects of the playbook are known by themselves and their colleagues |
Definition |
Number of questions raised to the catalyst that are already in the playbook |
Recall rate on the playbook content, relevant to his area, by the colleagues |
|---|---|---|---|
Goals |
Contribution |
Contribution |
|
Calculation rule |
No measure |
The number of people who can describe the content in the playbook that is relevant to their area |
|
Tools |
Survey to team members |
Actively inform the team of the need to review with the architecture council |
Definition |
The number of communications shared in the year that informs the team to review with the architecture council |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Liaison, Communication, Adoption, Feedback |
|
Calculation rule |
Number of emails, chats, and meetings informing the team to review with the council |
|
Tools |
Email, GChat, Slack, Calendar |
Actively look for opportunities for architects to have an impact, in particular in emerging areas |
Definition |
Number of opportunities where the catalyst involved the architects |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Liaison, Contribution |
|
Calculation rule |
No measure |
|
Tools |
Actively participate in architecture reviews |
Definition |
Percentage of reviews attended |
Percentage of meeting minutes in which the catalyst is mentioned |
|---|---|---|---|
Goals |
Expertise, Contribution |
Expertise, Contribution |
|
Calculation rule |
Number of reviews attended / Number of reviews |
TNumber of meeting minutes mentioned / Number of meeting minutes |
|
Tools |
Meeting notes |
Meeting notes |
Influence changes in architecture for their groups in all areas, e.g., reviews, implementation, and council meetings |
Definition |
Number of designs that were changed to align with the architecture |
|---|---|---|
Goals |
Liaison, Alignment, Communication, Adoption |
|
Calculation rule |
No measure |
|
Tools |